menu
close

Author(s):

Matteo Alpino | Bank of Italy
Luca Citino | Bank of Italy
Annalisa Frigo | Bank of Italy

Keywords:

energy crisis , price-elasticity of energy demand

JEL Codes:

Q41

Using survey data from Italy, we study the effects of the 2021 energy crisis on the energy input choices of medium and large-sized industrial firms. Our instrumental variable (IV) strategy, based on the availability of fixed-price contracts subscribed before the crisis, reveals an average infra-annual price elasticity of demand very close to zero for both electricity and natural gas. Large energy consumers subject to the European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS) have significantly larger natural gas elasticities and were able to partially substitute gas with other fossil fuels.

Introduction

The surge in natural gas and electricity wholesale prices that started in mid-2021 has sparked widespread concerns regarding the EU industrial sector and the economy more broadly. The magnitude of its detrimental effects and the effectiveness of the policies designed to address them are closely linked to the price elasticity of energy demand (Bachmann et al., 2022; Gros, 2022), a crucial parameter for which there is a dearth of evidence. In this policy brief, we summarize a recent empirical study (Alpino, Citino, and Frigo, 2023), estimating the infra-annual elasticities of electricity and gas demand for the year 2021.

Methodology and data

The study draws on data from the Bank of Italy’s Survey of Industrial and Service Firms (Invind). This dataset offers insights into the physical quantity and monetary value of gas and electricity consumption on a bi-annual basis, enabling the calculation of average prices paid by individual firms and their change between the first and second semester of 2021. Additionally, the survey records information on whether firms rely on fixed-price energy supply contracts, a safeguard against wholesale price increases. Leveraging these data, we construct an instrumental variable that predicts within-year price changes at the firm level and allows the identification of the demand elasticities of interest. We restrict the sample to industrial companies that have a minimum of 50 employees, excluding energy generation and refineries.

For the subsample of firms subject to the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS), we supplement the baseline variables with administrative data on annual energy consumption by fossil fuel from ISPRA (Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research). Excluding energy companies and refineries, firms subject to the EU-ETS (less than 400) account for more than half of aggregate industrial consumption of natural gas.

Key Findings

  • Gradual and heterogeneous pass-through from wholesale to retail energy prices: In the second half of 2021, increases in firm-level energy prices were significantly lower (20% relative to the first semester in case of electricity, and 40% in case of natural gas) than corresponding wholesale price changes (150% in case of electricity and 200% in case of gas). Furthermore, firms that procured energy through fixed-price contracts signed at the beginning of the year experienced relatively lower increases in the second semester (20 percentage points lower relative to other firms in case of electricity, and 14 percentage points in case of natural gas).
  • Limited incidence of energy cost for most firms: Prior to the crisis, the average energy intensity, represented by the ratio of gas and electricity expenditure to total variable costs (excluding labour cost), stood at around 5%. However, this distribution displayed significant skewness, with approximately one tenth of firms exceeding an energy intensity of 11%.
  • Limited and heterogeneous responsiveness: the average estimated infra-annual price elasticity of demand is very close to zero for both electricity and natural gas (left and middle panel of the Figure). However, firms subject to the EU-ETS display significantly larger natural gas elasticities (right panel of the Figure) and were able to partially replace the energy content of natural gas with other fossil fuels. Note that estimates for the EU-ETS sample are imprecise.

Figure 1: Infra-annual price elasticity of energy demand in 2021- IV estimates
 width=
Note: The figure provides a graphical visualization of the IV-estimates of a specification where the outcome is the difference in log energy consumption between the second and the first semester 2021 (y-axis), the endogenous regressor is the difference in log energy price between the second and the first semester 2021 (x-axis), the excluded instrument is a dummy for firms that procured energy through fixed-price contracts signed at the beginning of 2021 (“Protected firms” in the legend) and controls include: sector fixed effects, size class fixed effects, macro-region fixed effects, turnover in 2020, employment, share of self-generated electricity, a dummy for emission accounting, a dummy for firms included in the EU-ETS, and a dummy for electricity intensive firms according the Italian regulation. Each panel reports results of a different IV regression. The estimated elasticity is the slope of the black regression line.

Conclusion

This paper sheds light on energy consumption patterns among medium and large industrial firms in Italy and provides estimates of their price elasticity of demand for natural gas and electricity. The analysis reveals that, on average, these elasticities were relatively small in 2021, except for firms subject to the EU-ETS, where gas demand exhibited higher responsiveness. In the longer run, firm demand may of course have reacted differently to the initial shock, as well as reflected the further increases in wholesale prices resulting from the war outbreak in 2022, and the changes in expectation regarding the length of the energy crisis. In order to address these issues, we plan to extend the analysis to 2022 using a similar set of questions included in the latest Invind survey wave.

References

Alpino, Citino, Frigo. (2023). “The effects of the 2021 energy crisis on medium-sized and large industrial firms: evidence from Italy.” Occasional Paper No. 776, Bank of Italy.

Bachmann, Baqaee, Bayer, Kuhn, Löschel, Moll, Peichl, Pittel, and Schularick (2022). “What if? The economic effects for Germany of a stop of energy imports from Russia.” ECONtribute Policy Brief No. 028.

Gros (2022). “Why gas price caps and consumer subsidies are both extremely costly and ultimately futile”, CEPS Policy Insights No 2022-28 / August 2022.

About the authors

Matteo Alpino

Matteo Alpino works as economist at the Bank of Italy since 2019. His research focuses on political and public economics, and more recently on energy and climate. He holds a PhD from the University of Oslo. Website: https://sites.google.com/site/alpinomtt/.

Luca Citino

Luca Citino works as a research economist in the Firms and regional analysis unit of the Structural Economic Analysis Directorate of the Bank of Italy. He holds a PhD in economics from the London School of Economics and Political Science (awarded in 2020). His research focuses on public, energy and environmental economics. Website: https://luca-citino.github.io/.

Annalisa Frigo

Annalisa Frigo works as a research economist at the Local Economic Research Division of the Venice Regional Branch of the Bank of Italy. Before, she worked as economic and policy analyst at the Join Research Centre of the European Commission. She holds a doctorate degree in economics from Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.

More on these topics

Tags: