7th SUERF & UniCredit Foundation Research Prize
Passive versus Active Asset Portfolio Management: Trends, Drivers, Risks
The question whether active portfolio management can systematically improve a portfolio’s return has been debated for long. The rise of low-cost ETFs, FinTech and AI has been reinforcing pressures on active portfolio managers to prove the value for money of their service. At the same time, the financial crisis and the rise of populist policies have highlighted the importance and the potential benefits for portfolio performance from anticipating low-probability high-impact events. Furthermore computer trading and AI-assisted portfolio analysis and investment strategies are making fast progress, reducing the cost of “active” management strategies in the future. From a financial stability perspective, the widespread use of similar passive management strategies or similar forms of portfolio investment algorithms may generate synchronous behaviour, reinforce price fluctuations and pose risks to financial stability. The large scale of ETF markets may also make potential instability from this sector systemically important.
Scientific committee
Aleati Annalisa, UniCredit Foundation
Ernest Gnan, OeNB and SUERF
Carl-Christoph Hedrich, Commerzbank and SUERF
Esa Jokivuolle, Bank of Finland and SUERF
Frank Lierman, Belgian Financial Forum and SUERF
Christian Upper, BIS and SUERF